Having made a comparison of pairs of terminals Samsung most interesting on the market today, with the Samsung Galaxy S4 the reference for these comparisons ( Samsung Galaxy Note 2 , Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3 and Samsung Galaxy Mega 5.8 ) we have now to make a comparison between all to know roughly where framing each of these terminals within Range of Koreans.
class=”wp-caption id=”attachment_65707″ aligncenter
Design and Display
In this section, as we can see is where we may see more similarities within the entire blog post. All this is because Samsung has used in the quartet of models analyzed in this paper the design guidelines of the brand and virtually the same building materials (polycarbonate in all cases) for all of them. This policy of Samsung, which is under attack from many quarters to make devices almost identical in design and appearance with few differences in size, has its good points. One of the advantages that follow this strategy provides Korean brand is building a brand image. It you see the Samsung device you see (and we assure you that the catalog is very extensive) you know it’s a Samsung hardly seeing the logo of the brand.
Howeverbelieve that the same could have been done without a device designs so different in other things so similar if not the same. Except for the obvious size difference between them all especially characterizes them.
have the typical four button Samsung, the four touch buttons have back and application drawer, the four have the volume control on the same site, the 4 with the button the power button at the same site .
course, once we started to introduce more technical specifications the differences start to become more than obvious. In the four devices we can see up to three different resolutions ranging from 1920 × 1280 Samsung Galaxy SIV to the 960 × 584 Samsung Galaxy Mega 5.8 , through the 1280 × 720 Samsung Galaxy Note 2 and Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3. As for the technology they are built find two modalities, or LCD SuperAMOLED providing this a first idea range of positions in which each of the four terminals.
Say the Mega
, in both versions, are a step below the Note II SIV or less by resolution as the Mega Note II 6.3 and share it, but by the technology with which they are made. Some with the jewel in the crown of the Korean commercial level and others with a more affordable technology but also successfully across distances.
class=”wp-caption id=”attachment_65706″ aligncenterclass=”c6″> Camera and Multimedia
For cameras that present each of the four terminals we focus on the first because the front camera in all cases are very similar, yielding even. In the case of cameras we can find two 13 Megapixel resolutions of Samsung Galaxy SIV 8MP front of other smartphones analyzed. In this case as note that the Samsung Galaxy Note II accompany stops Samsung Galaxy SI V in the first step to catch up with her other siblings, the Samsung Galaxy Mega 5.8 Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3, unlike what happened with the screens.
class=”wp-caption id=”attachment_50967″ aligncenter
Processor, Memory
In this case we find again two very distinct steps between the four terminals, first find the lower echelon occupied by Mega terminals with dual-core processors at 1.4 GHz and 1.7 GHz respectively, and that far from upper echelon are occupied by the Samsung Galaxy SIV and the Samsung Galaxy Note II . However, within this upper echelon would have to do a second ranking as the quad-core processor Note II is not comparable with SIV in either of its two versions, Exynos or Snapdragon 600.
RegardingRAM if we have two distinct steps. The first step comprises the terminals with 2 GB of RAM (SIV and Note II) while the second step comprises the two terminals of the Mega range (5.8 and 6.3) with 1.5 GB each.
class=”wp-caption id=”attachment_65153″ aligncenterinternal storage also found the same division into two steps, one occupied by the terminals whose maximum internal storage capacity is 64 GB, Case Note II and SIV. And another step occupied by Mega terminals that only reach 16 GB. That if all be extended via microSD card up to 64GB Samsung Galaxy Mega except that you can only do 5.8 to 32GB
class=”c6″> OS and Software
S.O. level
the four terminals appear on the market or will be upgraded to Android 4.2.2. and the big difference to be found in the software and Samsung’s proprietary production accompanying each terminal. In this case we can say that the greatest number and quality of innovations will first present moment will certainly be the Samsung Galaxy SIV for that is the flagship of the Korean brand. Without ruling out that many of these features or apps updates are incorporated through the rest of the four smartphones analyzed.
connectivity and autonomy
As for connectivity
the four terminals except going very smooth and Samsung Galaxy Mega 5.8 all have LTE connectivity to protocols and other standards in the current Android handsets, WiFi, DLNA, MicroUSD, Bluetooth 4.0, a-GPS, etc. ..
difference and perhaps the only point in which the terminals of the Mega range outweigh the other two is the issue of autonomy because as expected to find larger and larger capacity batteries if this accompany it with the lower standards for lower resolution screens and less powerful processors we find that the autonomy of these devices exceed the Mega range to SIV or Note II. This is particularly evident in the case of Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3 as the ability Samsung Galaxy Mega 5.8 Samsung Galaxy equals SIV and is by below the Samsung Galaxy Note II.
class=”c6″> Conclusions
We face four terminals physically very similar between them (relatively speaking of screen size) but nevertheless are far from each other in terms of technical capabilities. As there is a large gap between two terminals to each other are very even and the other two very evenly matched estean igualemten together. The first, being in the lower echelon, and practically differentiated only by the size and resolution of the screen is the Samsung Galaxy Mega 5.8 and Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3 . While at a higher step found the Samsung Galaxy SIV and the Samsung Galaxy Note II . Yes, between the latter two are more differences there may be between the terminals of the bottom step, which as we said are the same.
Obviously as evidentterminals of the lowest step will be priced lower. And therefore each assess their own needs and based on that and your budget will choose one of the terminals here compared and if done right this process of analysis available budget needs and we are confident that the terminal will choose the very satisfied for all are good terminals that cater to needs / individual budgets.
No comments:
Post a Comment