The reason why some Galaxy Note 7 turned out to be a dud for Samsung, will be revealed soon.
Samsung will reveal the results of its investigation next January 23 and said it will give details on why some devices are re-heated and even, fire.
Related: The new Samsung Galaxy S8 could have a slot for Micro SD
Announce why the cell failed to put to bed the rumors and speculation about the reasons that caused skilled problems. It is believed that these were the batteries, the safety barriers and the way in which was manufactured the machine which made this phone a danger.
A report even claimed that Samsung had "violated basic rules of engineering" when he fabricated the Note 7.
despite the fact that the expectations were high and the cell was purchased by millions of people, after weeks of fires, the Note 7 was pulled from the market.
Until now, the company has not given an official explanation since he started doing the collection of the cell at the end of last year all over the world.
The director of Samsung Koh Dong-jin, harp announcement, and promises to tell "the exact point that caused the Galaxy Note 7 to burst into flames and will announce measures in consequence."
it Is expected that the explanation will satisfy the consumers who purchased the Note 7. It is also expected that the Samsung brand name, hold your image.
This last point is a cave, given that the company will announce soon the Samsung Galaxy S8, which is expected to be as successful as the previous versions: the Galaxy S7 and S7 the Edge.
For this, you need to ensure that the devices are safe and that there will not be any type of pick-ups or problems of manufacture which are a repetition of the Note 7.
despite the fact that Samsung is about to close one of the most bizarre in recent history, continues to struggle with a new one.
Related: Samsung reveals by mistake the name of your new intelligent assistant
In South Korea, the Vice president of the Board of Directors of the company is in the midst of a corruption scandal that has even resulted in the revocation of the mandate of the President of the country.
No comments:
Post a Comment